Earnings move database · CC BY 4.0 · Updated 2026-09-30

LZB: Expectations vs Outcomes

Every tracked La-Z-Boy print on both axes: what the straddle charged going in against what the stock did coming out, and what management guided against what the company printed.

Rolling ratio

1.65x

mean of 1 scored print

Beat the straddle

100%

of 1 scored prints

Cleared its guide

n/a

no guidance tracked

One scored print is not a track record. A rolling ratio only starts meaning something after several quarters, and this name has 1. Read the row, not the average.

Print by Print

FQ1 2027

Scored

Reported 2026-08-18 (after close) · reaction session 2026-08-19

Implied
±10.3%
struck about a week out, 2026-08-14
Realised
-16.9%
close to close
Ratio
1.65x
+6.6% vs priced
Rolling
1.65x
after 1 scored

40.83 to 33.91

Adjusted EPS of 0.47 missed the street and the second-quarter guide came in light, and the reaction session closed 16.95% lower, from 40.83 to 33.91. That is 1.65 times the 10.3% implied, and it vindicates the preview's refusal to sell premium in a name whose previous print moved 25%. Two other figures circulated for the same reaction and neither is the session: Benzinga had the stock down nearly 24% in after-hours trading on August 18, and an intraday read on August 19 had it at 31.50, down 19.5%. The close-to-close figure is the one this row records.

Our preview, trade logstockanalysis.com daily close table: 40.83 on 2026-08-18, 33.91 on 2026-08-19Yahoo Finance daily chart series, an independent feed agreeing to the cent on both closesIndependent read: closed 33.91 on August 19, down 16.95%

Our Coverage

LZB rows from the Implied vs Realised Earnings Move Database, Regards of Wallstreet. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Methodology · Full database