RPO Tracker · BA · Updated 2026-07-28

Boeing: Contracted Revenue

Boeing reported $715B of Order backlog at Q2 2026, which is 7.60x the trailing twelve months of the revenue it converts into. The median across all 11 disclosures tracked is 3.34x.

Contracted

$715B

Q2 2026, Whole company

Coverage

7.60x

against $94B of trailing revenue

Due within 12 months

Not disclosed

no near-term split published

Weighted duration

Not disclosed

the company published none

Q2 2026

Period ended 2026-06-30 · reported 2026-07-28

Metric
Order backlog · Whole company
Contracted balance
$715B
Denominator
Full year 2025 revenue of $89.5bn, plus first half 2026 revenue of $46.8bn ($22.2bn and $24.6bn), less first half 2025 revenue of $42.25bn. The 2025 half-year figure is derived from the reported year over year growth rates of 14% and 8% on those quarters.
Coverage
7.60x (scopes match)
Duration
Boeing publishes no duration, but the unit count gives one: over 6,200 commercial aircraft in backlog against 171 delivered in the quarter is roughly nine years of production at the current rate. That is the closest thing to a duration disclosure in this table, and it comes from dividing two numbers Boeing does publish.
Notes
The reason this dataset is not an AI dataset. Boeing carries a record $715bn backlog, $597bn of it commercial aircraft, on $94bn of trailing revenue: 7.6x coverage, wider than Amazon's cloud backlog and not far off Alphabet's. Nobody calls it a bubble, because everyone already understands that an aircraft backlog converts over a decade and that the constraint is production, not demand. That is the correct frame for reading every other row here. The backlog stood at roughly $695bn at the end of Q1 2026.

Sources: company filing or release · company filing or release

Our Coverage

Part of the free RPO and Backlog Coverage Tracker, CC BY 4.0. Cite as: RPO and Backlog Coverage Tracker, Regards of Wallstreet, https://www.regardsofwallstreet.com/data/rpo/entity/boeing. The methodology explains how coverage is calculated and why the scope of both halves matters.